白鹭

B | 今年第12号台风“梅花” 已于今天（13日）凌晨 移入东海南部海面， 并于早晨5点钟加强为强台风级。    New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) One of the judges in the Supreme Court bench, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, differed with the view of his colleague, Justice Hemant Gupta on many issues.

Justice Dhulia said that asking a pre university schoolgirl to take off her hijab at her school gate, is an invasion on her privacy and dignity.

"Asking a pre university schoolgirl to take off her hijab at her school gate, is an invasion on her privacy and dignity. It is an attack on their dignity, and then ultimately it is a denial to them of secular education. These are clearly violative of Article 19(1)(a), Article 21, and Article 25(1) of the Constitution of India," Justice Dhulia said, in his verdict.

"Under our Constitutional scheme, wearing a hijab should be simply a matter of Choice. It may or may not be a matter of essential religious practice, but it still is, a matter of conscience, belief, and expression. If she wants to wear hijab, even inside her class room, she cannot be stopped, if it is worn as a matter of her choice, as it may be the only way her conservative family will permit her to go to school, and in those cases, her hijab is her ticket to education," Justice Dhulia said, in his verdict.

Justice Dhulia even went onto say that the unfortunate fallout of the hijab restriction would be that we would have denied education to a girl child. A girl child for whom it is still not easy to reach her school gate.This case here, therefore, has also to be seen in the perspective of the challenges already faced by a girl child in reaching her school.

"The question this Court would put before itself is also whether we are making the life of a girl child any better by denying her education merely because she wears a hijab!," Justice Dhulia questioned?

Our Constitution has visualised a just society and it is for this reason that the first virtue that is secures for the citizens is ‘Justice’ which is the first of our Preambular promises, he said.

On the other hand, the judge heading the bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Hemant Gupta, differed with the view of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and said that the Government (Karnataka) Order cannot be said to be contrary to the State goal of promoting literacy and education as mandated under the Constitution.

"Article 21A is not applicable as all the students are over 14 years of age. The students have a right to education under Article 21, but not of insisting on wearing something additional to the uniform, in a secular school, as a part of their religion," Justice Gupta, heading the bench of the Top Court said.

"Secularism applicable to all citizens. Permitting one religious community to wear religious symbols would be antithesis of secularism. Govt Order can't be said to be against secularism or objective of Karnataka Education Act," Justice Gupta in his 133-page, out of 209-page, verdict said.

"It can't be said that State is restricting the access to education to the girl students through such an Order. The Government Order only ensures that the uniform prescribed is adhered to by the students and it cannot be said that State is restricting the access to education to the girl students through such an Order, Justice Gupta said.

He went on to say that the Act itself contemplates providing of opportunities and facilities in a healthy manner and maintaining the dignity of childhood and youth so that there is no moral or material abandonment. "The uniform for the students has been prescribed so that there is no distinction between the students coming from diverse background and that each student grows in an environment of equality, fairness and equal opportunities," Justice Gupta said.

The uniform is an equalizer of inequalities. Therefore, prescribing uniform for children at an impressionable age is not only important but has a salutary effect on the mental development of the child to grow in the environment of oneness, he said.

Justice Gupta, find that the following 11 questions arise for consideration in the present appeals:

Whether the appeals should be heard along with Kantaru Rajeevaru (Right to Religion) and/or should the present appeals be referred to the Constitution Bench.?

Whether the State Government could delegate its decision to implement the wearing of uniform by the College Development Committee or the Board of Management or otherwise on headscarves is ex facie violative of Section 143 of the Act?

What is ambit and scope of the right to freedom of ‘conscience’ and ‘religion’ under Article 25? What is the ambit and scope of essential religious practices under Article 25 of the Constitution?

UNI SM BAV GNK。中央气象台9月13日10时 继续发布台风橙色预警。山东省气象台于9月13日06时00分继续发布海上大风黄色预警受12号台风“梅花”外围和冷空气影响，13日白天，东北风，黄海中部5～6级增强到6～7级阵风8级，渤海、渤海海峡和黄海北部5～6级；13日夜间到14日白天，东北风，黄海中部7～8级阵风9级，渤海、渤海海峡和黄海北部6～7级阵风8级14日下午增强到7～8级阵风9级；14日夜间，黄海中部和北部东北风转东南风7～8级阵风9级，渤海和渤海海峡东北风7～8级阵风9级。13日白天到夜间，黄海中部天气阴有中到大雨局部暴雨，黄海北部天气多云转阴有小雨，渤海和渤海海峡天气多云。14日白天到夜间，渤海海峡、黄海北部和中部天气阴有大到暴雨局部大暴雨，渤海天气阴有小雨局部中雨。黄海中部和北部东北风转东南风7～8级阵风9级，渤海和渤海海峡东北风7～8级阵风9级。15日白天到夜间，渤海海峡和黄海中部天气阴有大到暴雨局部大暴雨，渤海和黄海北部天气阴有中到大雨局部暴雨。渤海东北风7～8级阵风9级减弱到6～7级阵风8级，渤海海峡东北风7～8级阵风9级转东南风6～7级阵风8级，黄海中部和北部东南风7～8级阵风9级减弱到6～7级阵风8级。省防指下发通知做好今年第12号台风“梅花”防御工作↓↓↓提高认识，压实压紧防御责任。台风“梅花”强度大，路径复杂，可能带来强风、暴雨、高潮、巨浪、洪涝等灾害，加之我省当前刚刚开海，水利工程蓄水普遍偏多，防御工作面临严峻考验。各级各部门要立足于防强风、防暴雨、防山洪、防内涝，坚决克服麻痹思想和侥幸心理，充分估计本次台风可能造成的最严重影响，迅速进入实战状态，严阵以待，做好万全准备。各级防汛行政责任人要在岗在位、靠前指挥，把隐患排查整治、监测预警、动员群众、物资保障、应急处置、人员转移安置等各方面工作抓紧抓实抓细。

C | 各部门各单位要各司其职，各负其责，密切配合，通力协作，形成防汛防台风工作合力。要严肃防汛纪律，对因责任不落实、工作不到位、工作组织不力造成严重后果的，依法依规追责问责。密切监视，及时有力预警响应。

D | 各级防指要密切关注台风动向和雨情、水情、汛情，及时组织气象、海洋、自然资源、水利、农业农村、应急等部门联合会商研判，滚动预测预报，突出抓好大风、风暴潮、局地强降雨、山洪和地质灾害监测预警，为各级做好防汛防风工作提供有力支撑。要狠抓预警与响应联动，根据气象预报，及时发布预警、启动响应，切实增强工作主动性和前瞻性。要充分利用广播、电视、手机短信、网络等多种途径，提前发布预警信息，提醒公众科学防范，有效避灾避险。

E | 全面排查，彻底消除风险隐患。各级各部门要针对海上渔船、重点船舶、海上交通、施工项目、沿海景区、山洪地质灾害隐患点等防汛防台风重点区域、部位、场所、设施开展拉网式排查，发现隐患迅即整改，坚决彻底消除风险隐患。要做好化工园区、工矿企业、高温熔融金属等高危企业和电力、交通、通信、市政等重要基础设施的防洪防台风工作，必要时采取停工、停业、停产、停课、停运等非常措施。要全面排查广告牌、玻璃幕墙等高空构筑物及塔吊、围墙、行道树等易倒伏物，妥善做好加固或拆除工作。要提前关闭旅游景点，有序疏散游客，全力保障安全。

F | 要抓紧做好城区内河道、排水管网、暗渠、雨水口和排水泵站疏通工作，逐一落实应急抢排、交通管制和人员疏散措施，确保城市安全运转。

G | 不漏一人，狠抓人员避险转移。各级各部门要把人民群众生命安全放在工作首位，咬定“不死人、少伤人”目标，全力做好人员转移避险工作。要突出抓好船只回港避风、海上作业人员和近海渔排养殖人员上岸避险工作，加强对回港船只、“三无”船只及跨省避风渔船的监管，做到不漏一船、不留一人。

H | 要针对山洪灾害易发区、地质灾害隐患点、病险水库、头顶库、尾矿库、工地简易板房、城乡危房、学校幼儿园、养老院等，进一步细化实化人员转移方案，逐户落实转移路线、安置地点、责任人、联系人、转移交通工具等，第一时间果断转移危险区人员，确保应转尽转、应转早转。要统筹做好人员安置和新冠疫情防护，全力保障转移群众生活，严防新冠疫情传播，严禁转移人员私自返回。强化统筹，科学调度水利工程。要立足抗御强台风、大暴雨的最不利情况，切实做好水利工程运行管理工作，组织对强降雨地区水库逐库开展纳雨能力分析，科学调洪，留足防洪库容。

I | 要加强水利工程巡查、防护和调度，尤其是小水库、塘坝、险工险段要派专人24小时盯守，一旦发现险情，要迅速组织抢护，及时排除险情。要统筹河道上下游、左右岸、干支流，提前开启拦河闸坝，科学调度拦洪、错峰、滞洪，最大限度发挥水利工程防洪减灾效益。强化值守，提前做好救援准备。各级要切实强化值班值守力量，严格执行汛期领导带班和24小时值班制度，强化部门联合值班值守和信息报送，特别是遇突发险情、灾情，必须第一时间上报，坚决防止漏报、迟报、瞒报、误报。要备齐备足防汛救灾物资，落实运输车辆、运输路线和运输人员，全力保障防汛抢险救援需要。要统筹消防救援队伍、专业救援力量和社会救援力量，加强与解放军、武警部队和民兵预备役队伍联动，及时与海事部门沟通，针对重点地区和部位提前预置救援力量，确保快速出动、高效救援，全力保障人民群众生命财产安全。青岛市气象台 2022年09月13日10时50分 发布大风黄色预警信号受第12号台风“梅花”外围环流影响， 预计明天凌晨到夜间， 我市东北风风力逐渐增大， 沿海地区可达4～5级阵风7～8级， 近海海域7～8级阵风9级。受台风“梅花”外围影响，预计14日白天到16日我市有大雨到暴雨局部大暴雨。

J | 防御措施要做好！！ 收好这份台风防御自救指南 关键时候用得上↓↓↓ 来源｜@中国天气、@山东天气、@青岛气象